In the reasoning world of the 21st century in order to analyse question and answer, the how? and the why?, the how? is only reasonably required if it can lead to answers. Here in a restricted way there is question but not relationship to create consequence leading to value. Consequently, how? in isolation lacks relationship and becomes detached knowledge, whilst in isolation it is questionable as to the isolated value, whether it can stand alone, e.g. a developed man will grow hair on his face but he learns how to successfully remove facial hair. Simply because of how hair grows on the face it does not create a need to shave; it has to be overtaken by reasons to shave; why? must be satisfied even in the event of a simply how? Many men elect not to shave even though they know how to shave. Man looks for reasons beyond how? before he is satisfied with the knowledge. Similarly, when man buys a car it is very unlikely that he makes a purchase because he knows how the car is made; he relates the car to himself by what he can do with it. To give him a reason why? to buy it, man occasions a relationship with the car. There are consequences of value, e.g. ownership and use which are by degree valuable. The question how? leads to why? - a much bigger question and answer overtaking the original question to dominate. How? and why? cease to be separate notions but relate, which goes on to suggest that in the universe existence leads on to relationships and consequences and it is the consequences that beg and bring renewed reasoning in the search for value. Since reason is a reality there is always a need for relationships. How? becomes consequential, requiring relationship that produces value.
So it is with the universe; the consequences of original anti-relationship followed by subsequent relationship rearranges the questions about the universe; this is essential to modern reasoning.
Because man exists and man is the most intelligent of all relationships, he is only satisfied with question leading to the answer because, even if the answer is elusive.
Why? is most important; without it reasoning lacks common direction, i.e. the earth of the universe would be like a multi-million piece jigsaw with each piece cut differently in such as way as to not fit together, totally isolated and separate creations. The world/universe loses the guts of existence, reasoning and relationship abandoned; e.g. a gorilla is a gorilla but if individuals call it anything from a kangaroo to a cauliflower interpretation has become lost; man is lost as the varying names make a standard relationship impossible.
With realistics the important elements of relationship, consequence and the subsequent valuation of happening raise the search for the answer because; usually it forces a review of the importance of relationships.
