Realistics is about reasoning. There is no point to reasoning, as the word suggests, without reason.
Central to the question of reason is the answer because, which is only achievable from the question why? All other questions such as how?, what?, where?, when?, are only validated if they become supplemented by the answer because. There is only one question that invites the answer because and that is why?, whether asked directly or indirectly.
In order to investigate this further it is necessary to look at the totality of the universe. It is made of real components that by and large have a precise and continuing relationship. There is no totality of universe without components, existence (and non-existence) ending up as a supreme relationship. The totality of everything and nothing is made up of parts that fit together. Without each standpoint within the universe there would be no or different existence/non-existence which would be without reasonability. Consequently the totality, which is most important, needs components which in some, albeit obscure, way, relate. Reasoning/relationship are essential to create understanding. Without primary components (planets) relating, then the universe would be different and there is no way that it can be different.
Random existence could create different relationships (or not relate at all) which would be outwith reason.
The point to be made is that the whole comprises of parts that relate to form totality and totality is made up of parts that relate. The conclusion is that without relationship the meaning of totality of the universe becomes obscure.
Realistics argues that as a result of relationship there is an intangible framework which is real and that its reality both occasions and supports reasoning; further, the conclusion is that why the universe exists is to support real intangible relationships and reason, Without reasoning there is no answer because, and without because no acceptable analysis can be obtained. Since reasoning is the property of developed life on only one planet makes realistics easy to understand, it is examining components of situations to establish how they relate to make the whole that is reasoned and establishes the answer because, not necessarily the question why? The other thing that realistics states is that relationships have consequences and it is the job of realistics to try to facilitate common ground between apparent difference with a view to finding a common thread that makes up wholeness, that is the value. Realistics relates by reasoning to examine possible consequences and real consequences of relationships in order to arrive at the answer because, because being the answer to the primary question why?
Whilst the questions how? what? where? and when? become secondary, realistics is the study of the developed present, to discover relationships in an effort to determine values.
The job of realistics is to find threads that link apparent differentness, because differentness only exists as components of the whole yet must relate: a whole which is completely joined.
It follows that if differentness cannot be related, there is damage to the understanding of the whole. The whole only exists because somehow components relate.
There is a gap in practised learning in society today; this gap exists because professional teaching and subsequent learning tends to follow paths of separateness; this leads to division rather than creating togetherness which is the whole. Studies such as theology, science, and to some extent art and mathematics, become separatist to the point where highly developed learning becomes introvert, and such learning loses touch with other thinking; it becomes self-orientated, self-supporting, beyond the scope of consideration of anyone but an expert. Such modes of learning lead to the danger of divisive intelligent thinking, lacking relating thread that encourages totality of understanding.
What is necessary is to have generalised learning which discusses and investigates subjects, components looking for relationships and consequences to discover common elements of value that give better understanding of totality rather than separateness of components to be learnt: which leads to introvert and non-relating established view. Isolatory thought is because it does not relate to anything. Some scientists take the view that the totality of the universe is simply a how? There is no why, This in turn shocks the established view of theologians that the why question, or more to the point, the because answer, is of greatest importance. Diverse are some religiously minded scientists or scientifically-minded theologians who hedge their bets with argument that tends to be of the equivalent that something is definitely green therefore it must be yellow and blue as well, because yellow and blue make green. Some arguers seem to jump about; one minute they discuss God, then energy, then creation, without a coherent link, There is no attempt at relationship, just apparent fact; no attempt at relating components in such a way that is reasoned; no reason; no answer because - just isolated fact. Given that we are approaching the 21st-century this is a sad state of affairs; despite millions spent on determining the origins of the universe we are still faced with intellectual impasse since there appears to be no answer because. Because because is fundamental to all reasoning, there must be questionable questioning. This leads into realistics, examining how? questions are phrased thereby determining-satisfactory or unsatisfactory question.
Realistics takes from science and modifies questions, looking for the -answer because, leading directly or indirectly to the question why? The exciting thing about realistics is that there is both pure and applied notions, turning the focus on virtually anything of importance.
The working ground of realistics is the present, therefore to look at how we live now, what knowledge we have gained during the past, the aim being to make the future more predictable. The future (if it follows that the past is anything to go by) is still going to preside over more change and, if the future for man will have to cope with such change, man must remain adaptable.
The universe is regular, unchanging; what change there is depends upon the individual planets having change thrust upon them from within. Earth change, if it is to believe in the theory of evolution, could make man obsolete as man makes consistent resort to further provide for life. The danger is obvious; if man resorts into reality he is using reality up and if man evolves into a yet more complex being, it is difficult to see how such a being could foster renewed existence, i.e. whether the earth could cope. What must be possible is that man's descendant could suffer the same fate as the dinosaur and become misappropriate as to what the earth could provide.
In realistics it is thought that man unthinkingly makes too much recourse into reality to support an advanced lifestyle. It is obvious that supplies of usable earth are reducing, yet man increasingly relies on real finite existence. Man must learn to make more out of life without stressing the earth.
Realistics highlights relationship as a big value for life, the planet, the universe.
Everything is just part of one huge relationship. It is obvious that relationship is an overriding qualitative value-throughout existence, the combination of nothing/something individualises existence throughout the universe.
One big value for life is where life is subject to the cementing of relationship with love, i.e. the relationship is so powerful it makes new pleasures and demands upon life.
God is love, the supreme relator in Heaven where love is without. God is forced into the development and management of life, ensuring that each individual has the capacity to love. Love established on the planet (unlike Heaven) is within the being, whilst subject to corruption without. God knows that he exposes man to sinful problems but recognises that -if there were only love in Heaven, God could be deemed as being selfish; therefore love is established outwith Heaven. Love is important to being and the expression of love is equally important. Life lives and presides over a need to express love throughout life. Love dominates life in such a way that all the being does is centred around making love and the product of love (offspring). So good a relationship is love it is at the heart of all management of earth's resources. As love dominates so well, realistics is built around it, declaring the need for socialism as a primary requirement in life. Socialism is all about the love of man for his counterparts. Socialism is communal love, a making of society sociable, without realistic views of what man should and should not do. Without them man will become trapped in complex problems of how to support his life for centuries to come.
What man must learn to do is how to protect the earth in such a way as to make life more comfortable and relaxed for future generations.
