God gave man two eyes, two ears, and a head that swivels, in order that man makes a broad church out of learning and thought, to enable him to survive through life, quickly learning to adapt to new situations. God did not mean man to concentrate on efforts that blow him to pieces or impoverish the world.
I would not mind betting the whole of everything is globular or ovoid, and that if man was to set off in a spaceship in a straight line, that eventually after many light years, man would end up back where he started. In other words, if there is to be empathy and relationship between all that does or does not exist, it is not unreasonable to expect everything to be empathetic in shape.
The problem with mathematics is that it contains too many contradictions in terms; firstly there is a notion of finity - the unit - then there is a notion of infinite units which is in itself a contradiction in terms. It is impossible to create a notion of infinite finity.
There must be a boundary to finity otherwise it is not finite. Arithmetic explains existence of something coming away from a suppressed nothing of no mathematical significance i.e. 9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0, -1, -2, and so on. What is brought to bear is the equal plus and minus units either side of nothing. This helps the argument that the something of existence is both infinite and equal, but the truth is the very opposite. In the real universe it is nothing that is infinitely real and valuable, completely encircling random finity thereby creating relationships. Aspects of arithmetic such a nil value nothing, infinite equal finity, and minus notions are non-existent. Reality is just the very opposite of maths, which represents corrupt logic. It is true also that nothing is of the infinite, consequently the greater degree of nothing is the individualising effect on the individual which is not simply an equal unit. Consequently mathematics is distortive view whereby the numbers do not suit what actually takes place.
Apart from quantifying which is a communicative device, mathematics has very little based upon reality, even though sometimes its expression is more valid, e.g. the concept of 1 million can either be mentally thought of as many units of equal one, but it is commonly expressed as more units of unequal nothing, leading to inequality of the nothing element, further leading to a distortion of what is one. Because mathematics is unable to breed in its own boundaries, it is disfiguring of the natural, which has clear boundary, the boundary of reality. Beyond reality lies Heaven, the home of God. The whole process of the understanding of reality is a simplifying rather than an exceedingly complex notion.
Made simple in mathematical term by the recurrence of three, a process which mathematics does not understand. Suffice to say that in all of everything and nothing there are really only three unique individualities. There is God, God the father in Heaven as a supreme individuality. There is infinite nothing, i.e. the Holy Ghost as a real, intangible non-existence, and finally there is finite existence as demonstrated by God the Son. Mathematics lacks of understanding of the significance of three recurring over and over again, displays distortive ignorance, with units going on to the value of nine, the three multiplied by itself, i.e. the total possible extremity of units value, i.e. the power of nine represents the discreation of all unity, the power to individualise by equal, equidistant synthetic units. It is God who holds the key, and furthermore it is right to at least personalise God, i.e. God is not an "it" as in some people's definition of him. It is disrespectful of the enormous power that God has. The writer is all for the personalising of God as not only is it to be respectfully worshipful, but it is also simplifying and simplicity is preferred to complication. God in Heaven, which is outside the boundaries of reality, controls the infinite value of nothing, and the finite value of individual existence. The important element of infinite time, as the key element of infinite nothing, represents the future and the past, controlled by God. God is the supreme unique keyholder, he is divine.
The first thirty or so pages of the book are what I call pure realistics, the thought expressed in individual words that are purposefully unequal, joined by association in relationship in order to reinforce meaning. Pure realistics is doing with unequal individualistic word what man has been used to doing with mathematical equalising code. This means that realistic thinking has a far greater scope than mathematics, ie it is pliable rather than rigid.
Applied realistics is to apply aspects of individualism and relationship to man's life support systems, giving new meaning to thinking. It is very easy to ridicule or diminish the role of thought, yet thought precludes everything of value to man, defective scientific thought leads to a world of biased unnaturalism, a prospect that we are already paying for as the symptoms of disease in environment, and the crush of the value of individualism to a distorted, displaced, disworld.
Realistic thinking acts as an antidote to ill thinking; first the brain rushes to rationalise the effects of new thinking but the brain is strongly natural and able to cope with new style thinking, especially because realistic thinking is a simplifying prospect.
Man's only problem with realistic thinking is the addiction or habit of scientific thinking, a habit which breeds in man a constant demand from without for daily newness and change. Realistic thinking is to make a stabilising change. The scope for work for man is huge as he learns by his own ingenuity to foster near perpetuality of value: value and benefit accrued out of the consequences of new and renewed relationships. Realistic thinking is not going backwards nor disinventing, it is going forward, enlightened by humanistic definition that shrugs off separatistic definition.
The whole point of realistic thinking is to present man with new answers. In a religious sense there is recognition of the value of Godianity, i.e. there is only one God, ruler of Heaven, finite existence, and infinite nothingness. Therefore it does not matter what secular religious motivating force is chosen as long as you are empathetic to the driving forces of God. Most of man's problems ensue from either confusion or contradiction in terms.
There are only three primary real separatenesses, Heaven, infinite nothing, and finite reality, the Trinity in a religious sense; everything else is an isolation from the primary three wholenesses.
It can be seen that it is a big mistake in not recognising that counting is an isolating process obtained by separating individuals from a wholeness, rather than spurious infinite addition. All this means that mathematical thinking man is untrue to reality, his logic is totally confused, primarily because he fails to recognise the supreme value of the unique heaven, and fails to recognise nothing as an infinite value.
The mathematical view is a protraction of the truth. Consequently for man it is the recognition of the value of realistic thinking which is a much simpler notion with very definite boundaries. The value of the equal equidistant unit must give way to the natural individualised recognition.
