LANGUAGE - starts with 26 letters each with a unique Identity of appearance and sound and in a mix of vowel and consonant. The mix of vowel and consonant is used to produce word, sentence etc. All letters are singular and different but can be multiplied (pluralised). Word enables us to describe unique meanings and affords a totally Independent notion of each unique letter. Consequently language containing unique identity and letter use is easy to understand. The literal description of everything is clear. Independent difference can readily be understood. Becoming proficient in speech leads to a ready knowledge of the description of all things. Each thing is different even if it is similar to the something else. Different languages around the world may vary in alphabet but apply the same principles as above.
MATHEMATICS - starts with 10 separate identities, one of nothing, 9 of something but unlike language it is questionable as to whether each separate unit stands on its own right.
As mathematics to be understood is to say that there is only one unique identity, that of one. One singular is the unit all other descriptions from 2 to infinity, including tens, hundreds etc. are all multiples of one. Therefore mathematics must say that there Is only one unique identity in describing all things that exist and pluralising numbers does not allow for the difference between things; all things are individual. The standard notion of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, can lead to appear that mathematics allows for 9 total differences, and that, from 10 unit quantities are multiple combinations of nine separate identities, but in truth 2-9 units are all multiples of one and cannot stand up on their own as clear separate identities. If 2-9 were unique units then no multiple of numbers could be achieved until from 10 onwards. If 1-9 were truly independent then numbers 11-19 is the first multiple of existence, followed by twenties, thirties and so on. It shows a way of allowing for differentness of the 9 singular values.
In addition to the above problem is just how nought/nothing Is qualified. 0 is easy to understand but if it is seen that first multiples of different units is 11-19 then the first multiple of nothing is 10. Therefore 10 should equal nothing, and all multiples of 10 such as 20, 30, 40 should be worth nothing.
As it stands with current understanding of numbers if 2-9 are identities of their own they must be different units, but for the current thinking of mathematics there are only two separate Identities, that of 0 nothing and one 1, as the only unique identify with all other numbers being multiples of one.
Supposing that it becomes clear that 2 to 9 are singularly different then multiples cannot exist until 11, and if 11 - 19 as first multiples has any basis in fact it has to be seen that, for instance, ten does not exist as a real finite multiple. This means that counting should be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 etc.
If 11 is seen as the first finite multiple then we would have 11 toes, 11 fingers with still only 5 units on each foot/hand, i.e. 2 x 5 = 11, and in the case of 6 + 5 = 12, an odd and an even making an even.
Of course it would appear that units of quantity is not as ready to understand as letter/word and to try to put mathematics on a plane to be as reasonable to existence the alphabet is fraught with significant loss of logic. As stated earlier in the book, in reality, mathematics is the inversion of the truth i.e. there is only one universe and all counting is separating identities within the notion of the one universe.
Therefore there is no multiplicity of the one single maximum value, only fractions of the one single maximum value. It is to be seen that only language is correct in definition in that all letters/words are within the total of one alphabet and that fragmentation of alphabet creates units of sound and appearance.
All this leads to the fact that mathematics is at the least a fallacy of existence and at the worst downright meaningless.
The purpose of mathematics is to account for all things. What becomes clear Is that it Is necessary to justify natural unique creations as different than accounting for a mass of made things. The accounting for unique man-made things is the same as natural unique things.
Natural things are unique and stand alone therefore to account for them is 0, 1, 0, over and over again. To account for a multiplicity of natural things is 0, 1, 0, times the total number in the model. Distinct from the natural, mass man made artificial things should read 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 3, 0, 4, 0, etc. This accounts for the sameness of man made things as well as giving each number its own exclusive identity by surrounding with nothing, and note that individuality stands up as part of a distinct total.
All the (sometimes tongue in cheek) analysis In this work covers simple addition and, multiplication. To account for minus notions or division notions, too, has to have a basis In fact.
As a general rule of thumb, nothing is the bottom and top of accounting for all, and any notion of minus and divide has to operate within this rule.
At pains in this work is to achieve accounting for everything in a way that emphasises with reality, and realistic thinking.
