In an early chapter it was stated that money was communistic and anti-relationship, that it acts as an abstract to turn apparently non-relatable reality into something common that can be applied. Money on its own is an abstract anti-relationship, application turns non-related reality into a relationship; hence in order to cover the whole of reality, money is liberally used to unite explanation of reality, but money is also communistic in that it supersedes individuality by flattening individual reality into a total shape which is the monetary total value.
Therefore money related to reality already reduces reality to a single monogamous existence with no individuality, yet it is individualism of reality that makes up the whole, not the separateness of individuals which are only separatenesses of the whole; consequently the society that is made up of individuality becomes ruled by the communising effect of money.
Therefore it is the purpose of Euro to respond to the needs of reality and endorsed value of individuality not to reinforce the communism that is money.
The long-term economic results could spell disaster. In reality a level field may be beneficial but it is the game that matters. That takes place despite the shape and quality of the pitch. Consequently the level of the pitch is not as important as the degree of the level of the game. What Euro is all about is the levelling of the game.
The result is that Euro distorts the game of reality creation, service creation, tax creation, and most of all the ability to create necessary capacity to buy which represents the level and the energy of economic life.
As a result Euro may level the field but it distorts the game by the reduction of individualistic opportunity to rule. The long-term effect will be one whereby players in the game ignore the greater difficulty in scoring against the opposition in favour of an own goal. The result, the reason, cripples the game as individualistic competition of individualism becomes separatism creating results as evenly as possible - managed creation.
The reason for this is choice which if not managed properly, instead of being a limited value, that is neither existence, element or property, an indeterminable (like time) creates pressure and it is only individualism that relieves the pressure by easing rather than making choice difficult. Individualism, eventually, unites under related value, e.g. Scotch whisky, English cheese, German sausage, Italian spaghetti, French wine and Spanish paella are individual, yet they all form choice and they all relate as food. But the individualism and its value is reinforced by making choice simpler through difference. Choice, the manner of separatism, is something that is difficult to value only to say that a choice of one is easier than a choice of two. The result of narrowing the variable that is money relating value in terms of above example is irrelevant as individualism supports any individual value of the differing products.
However once an attempt at devaluing individualism comes into effect, whilst probably (whilst unnecessary) hardly affecting diverse individualism except probably reducing its potential profitability, the effect on commonality of international products that are the same is disastrous. Germany, France, Spain, Italy, UK, all produce average family cars at an average price with similar features.
The result is choice but because the individuals are similar, choice is more difficult.
This leads to a situation whereby price and the value, ie money, comes into effect. The more difficult it becomes to create individual pricing the more profitability becomes difficult, The more that profit becomes difficult the greater the pressure on costs. Given that you can no longer gain value from currency difference, the more cuts are made elsewhere, most noticeably labour. But it is labour that produces capacity to buy. Reduction in capacity to buy results in a weak buy market, coupled with over-production of choice (with little to those between). Hence it is possible to argue that increased choice, wider market, creates economic waste at the same time as weakening the market on the buy side. This is reinforced by Euro. The long-term result is one of creating permanent recession whereby capacity to buy and the buy market is so much weaker than the sell by width or similarity on the sell side of the market. Too much flattening is detrimental. All that Euro achieves is managed choice of similarity, whereby cost of production and labour is suppressed below a satisfactory level. The pressure therefore results in Europe needing to export out of Europe to balance the books and enforce related sell/buy.
